Sunday

Two Book Reviews: She's Innocent, Really! And The True Story of the "Chicken Coop" Murders. Guest Writer's Mother, Low Blood Sugar and Car Accidents

It's two True Crime book reviews, one of an older book and one brand new.

The so-called "chicken coop" murders detailed in "The Road to Hell" left me mesmerized and spell-bound with excellent writing and a compelling story.

"False Arrest" is about a woman who was innocent of the murder charged against her. At least the author convinced me.

Guest Writer Michelle tells an intriguing tale of her mother, erratic blood sugar, automobile mishaps, missing cars and beginning a new life without a driver’s license.


Pic of the Day


The Thrasher



 Posted by Hello


The Old and the New

It was just the weirdest thing. I’d posted a book review on a web site I frequent. It was of an older book but I do book reviews on all books that I read, even those whose dust I must blow when yanking it off the library shelf.

One individual, who could have, just throwing it out there, went right on by my post as it was plainly labeled on the header page, book title and all, got on the thread and thought it a great hoot to mock the presentation of an older book review.

I mean you’d have been yukking all over the place at this woman’s (dim) wit. She even made the hilarious comparison that dag, suppose’d you’d have read “Moby Dick”, hahahaha, a book that is, I agree, quite old. As if no school child today should ever do a book review of “Moby Dick” because…well the book is older as I imagine this dim bulb considers.

At any rate, I did read an older book and I read a new book and I decided to do a review of both lest I offend. At least I assume the book about the Wineville so-called “chicken coop” murders is new in that it was on the library bookshelf under the placard stating “NEW ARRIVALS”.

The older book is “False Arrest” and was written sometime in the 80’s. It was an okay kind of read. This books claim to fame as it fits in my experience is that it is the first book I’ve ever read in my almost 60 years of life written about an alleged “innocent” person wrongly convicted of a crime that I believe IS REALLY INNOCENT!

“The Road Out of Hell” is a great read, a great true crime story, a book I could not put down yet forced myself to put down so I wouldn’t use it all up at once. These sorts of books are rare in my life.

Let’s move on to the reviews.




"The Road Out of Hell"…Anthony Flacco with Jerry Clark

Jerry Clark is Sanford Clark’s son. Sanford Clark is the protagonist of this book. He was 13 years old when his uncle Gordon Stewart Northcott took him from his Canadian childhood home to live in California to help out on the uncle’s newly acquired chicken farm.

The entire Northcott family is insane, let’s get that out of the way. Uncle Stewart was the most insane of them all.

Sanford Clark was very sane but his two years at the hell of Uncle Stewart’s chicken farm almost sent him over the brink. It is a testament to the human spirit that Sanford Clark survived it.

Anthony Flacco is likely the composer of the prose for this book and here’s a fellow who writes beautifully. Non-fiction books don’t lend themselves all that well to fluidity and pretty words, especially the true crime type of this particularl book, but Anthony Flacco managed to pull it off, kudos to him.

The terrific writing coupled with the totally captivating story of the tale kept me immersed for several days. This was one of those rare books that has me looking to see how much I have left to read and hoping the thickness of the remaining pages will stop decreasing that I may enjoy it longer.



And though a crime of a horrific nature, the book had a nice ending with Uncle Stewart getting his due as he deserved, dear Lord, that had to be the best scene of the book.

Wineville was the name of the California town in which Uncle Stewart had his chicken farm. The crimes of Stewart Northcott were so heinous that Wineville residents changed the name of their entire town.

Adolescent Sanford did as his Uncle Stewart commanded, taking care of the chickens, doing all daily chores, fixing Uncle Stewart’s meals and, of course, helping to murder and dispose of Uncle Stewart’s young victims.

Ah yes. Uncle Stewart was one mean, mean, mean son of a bitch. He got his jollies by being mean and Sanford was also the object of Uncle Stewart’s mean-ness. Young Sanford suffered more than any child his age should ever have to endure.

With beautiful prose and a continuing theme of a young boy surviving an aching “heaviness” as he buried young boys alive, was himself often thrown into a small pit to survive days on end, had to swing an axe at a young boy’s skull to aid in the kill, the book carries the reader through the days and mind-numbing hours of Sanford’s survival.

His own grandparents, who were full aware of Uncle Stewart’s strange-ness, left Sanford to suffer so horrifically until the young boy lost all touch with reality and a civil world.

Through a series of mis-steps, that crazy family, including the nutty grandmother and insane Uncle Stewart were finally stopped from their crimes.

If I had one complaint about this book it’s how unclear it was to me just why Sanford Clark was guilty of any crime. Yes it was frustrating to this reader that young Sanford would avoid escape or reporting the horror around him but knowing the story even in this day of age with phones and email of young people captured and held when it would seem that escape was very possible, I know these “prisoners” accept their captive fate that a casual observer would fine bizarre. Sanford Clark lived through his hell during an era when most people didn’t even have telephones. In fact, it was Sanford’s sister who finally had to drive down from Canada to save Sanford for the lack of communication available in the early 1900 era that the chicken coop crimes occurred.

Sanford was sent to an American reform school of some sort and I deduce that it was as much to keep him away from that insane family of his as any “crime” this victim might have committed.

I can’t recommend this book enough to True Crime afficiandos or any devout reader appreciative of fine prose and a captivating story.

Amazon code for this book

Wiki link to a movie made about this story…”The Changeling”

"False Arrest"-Joyce Lukezic and Ted Schwarz

Amazon link for this book.

Let us begin by asserting firmly that this book was written confidently, orderly and logically. It is not the stuff of pretty prose but there is a certain sanity in the presentation of the facts.

For the most part.

The author obviously believed his co-writer to be innocent of the crime for which she was accused. The book is written firmly with that belief and the reader is expected to know that Joyce Lukezic was not guilty of arranging the murder of her husband’s business partner and this book is simply an orderly compilation of the facts.

It might be giving away the ending but Joyce Lukezic was found not guilty, finally, at a third trial. She was found guilty at her first trial. She was granted a second trial. That trial ended with a hung jury, ten jurors believing Joyce to be innocent and two not budging from a guilty vote.

This is hardly a monsoon of belief of innocence and besides, a “not guilty” verdict does not necessarily mean the defendant is innocent of a crime but that the state failed to prove the case.

Still and so, I believe that Joyce Lukezic did not plot to have her husband’s business partner killed. This is the first time I have ever read one of these “he/she is really innocent” books and believed that assertion. I have no statistics but I’d bet a small fortune that most folks who end up in jail are usually guilty. I certainly have no problem with such as re-trials or any relook at the facts. The innocent don’t belong in jail. Jurors are very responsible people, much more responsible than crooked politicians who cheat and lie to keep their jobs. This True Crime afficiando has read entirely too many books and seen too many documentaries featuring jurors and I hear what they say. We all can identify with the terror of having our freedom, even our lives, taken away for a crime for which we are innocent. The OJ jury, notwithstanding, of course. Jurors want to get it right.




I will never understand why the investigators went after Joyce Lukezic for arranging the contract murder of her husband’s business partner. Her brother was involved in nefarious activities and was mixed up with Ron Lukezic’s partner, William Redmond. Joyce’s husband, in fact, Ron Lukezic, had way more reason to have his partner murdered than Joyce.

First, Joyce had a prenuptial agreement that left her getting nothing out of her husband’s business if her marriage with Ron Lukezic didn’t work out. Second, Joyce paid very little interest to her husband’s business affairs. Third, there was a bevy of folks around William Redmond far more likely to want him dead than his business partner’s wife.

The biggest source of evidence presented against Joyce was some jailhouse snitch. There was also a bunch of bad facts presented at trial and, in fact, because of this Joyce was granted a new trial.

I have two issues with this book. First, the author starts out straightaway with a horrible story of a lesbian attack of Joyce during her first few weeks in jail. I suppose that the author immediately wanted to put the reader in sympathetic mode that right from the start poor Joyce Lukezik suffered in jail for a crime she did not commit.

I thought that scene to be more prurient than informative. While the lesbian rape had every right to be part of the documentation of Joyce’s jail ordeal, to feature it at the beginning of the book, in your face, was confusing to this reader.

My second concern is that the author really didn’t give enough information about just why all the investigators, the entire first jury and two folks on the second jury, all seem to think Joyce was guilty. The author did a fine job of convincing ME that Joyce’s jailhouse accuser was a liar so why couldn’t he give me some idea why so many folks were out to get Joyce Lukezic?

There had to be something about this woman, the evidence, something, something, that had so many folks so eager to lock up her innocent self.

This book is a good read but going back to my original contention, it’s an older book. By me, it will be a stand out as being the first book I’ve ever read trying to convince me the book’s subject is innocent of the crime as charged.

And I believed it.

 Posted by Hello


Loss of a License

It's Wednesday afternoon at work, and I hear a cell phone distantly ringing. "Hmm," I thought, "someone has a cell phone on ring instead of vibrate." It wasn't answered, and the song stopped.

Only to start up again immediately. "Hmm," I thought, "someone really must have something important to say." Again it wasn't answered, and the song stopped.

Only to start up again a third time. "Hmm," I thought, "it must be something *really* urgent." And wham! I realized that sounded like MY cell phone, which was in my purse locked in the cabinet at the end of my desk. I waited for the song to stop and got my cell phone out.

NOTIFICATION, the screen said. MISSED CALLS: 3.

Oh, crap. I tapped on View, and saw three attempts from a Private number. That was no help. As I looked at that, wondering who I knew with a private number (besides my own house, where no one was), the phone chirped its "you've got voicemail" tone. Quickly I keyed in the voicemail retrieval commands.

A man's voice - which I didn't recognize - said he was trying to call Michelle Huh Kallah. With that mispronunciation of my name, my heart dropped. Anyone who knew it was my phone without knowing how to pronounce my name couldn't be calling for a good reason. And I was right.

The unknown man introduced himself as a city police officer, and he needed to tell me my mom had been involved in a diabetic-induced automobile accident. She was okay and wanted me to come to the hospital to pick her up. The car could be driven, but it was downtown, and my mom would be losing her license. He then gave me the hospital
name and address, the address where the car was, and the information I would need about the police report. (I have to admit he was very thorough, but he didn't give me the hospital phone number.)

I saved the message and looked up the hospital number online. Gotta love the Internet! With number in hand, I took my cell phone into the hallway and called the hospital. I must have sounded callous, asking the hospital emergency room staff if I needed to come "right now" or if I could go home and let my dogs out first. Harry wouldn't be home
until Friday, and the dogs had been locked up almost all day. If my mom really was okay, I knew I had time.

I did. The person who answered my questions told me they were going to keep my mom for at least another couple of hours. I thanked her, hung up, and went back to my desk to pack it in for the day. I shot a quick email to my boss and teammates, and as I was powering down the PC, my cell phone rang.

The cop was calling me back, to tell me he was taking the car keys to the hospital and to make sure he'd actually reached me. (Good cop. Conscientious, and he must have a mother, too. I need to listen to the first message again and see if he gives me his name, or get a copy of the police report so I can let the department know how helpful he was.)

I scurried home, let the dogs out, grabbed a book (hospitals can be slow), let the dogs out again and then locked them back up. They weren't very happy with me. Then off to the hospital, a forty minute drive.

At the hospital, I had to look hard for a parking place, and then I couldn't find the way in. I found the way in, and then I couldn't find the way to the rooms. The woman at the kiosk told me to talk to the security guard. Aren't the kiosks for customer/patient assistance
anymore? The security guard used the "Security Only" phone and called in to where the rooms are. I gave him my mom's name. He waited a minute, then hung up. He told me he'd check and to wait. Then he went through the locked door (how did *he* open it?) and I wait.

Around me are the sick, the injured, the hopelessly bored. One kid had a temporary sling, several people had breathing masks on, everywhere were notices that said, "COVER YOUR COUGH." There were no empty seats so I leaned against the wall by the Security Only phone. The waiting room looked like something from the Soylent Green movie and I was sorry my mom had to come here.

The locked door opened and the security guard beckoned me in. "Room 12," he told me, and pointed me in the right direction.

There was my mom, in Room 12, looking fine, but attached to an IV and blood pressure cuff. I got the rest of the details from her.

She'd been to see her "other" doctor, the one that is tracking her diabetes and in charge of her diabetic meds. She left the doctor's office around 11:20, and the next thing she knew two guys were asking her if she was okay. She was still in the driver's seat of her car.
Apparently she'd had another low blood sugar episode, and was driving the car without being aware of anything. Without being given gas, the car (a Ford Focus) goes about 10mph, and the steering is in alignment so it just kept going straight until it ran out of road. She missed - thank God - the freeway onramp she'd been heading for; just drove
right past it, unseeing. The car eventually hopped a curb and hit - gently - a parked car.

The EMTs reported her blood sugar level at 23.

There are so many ways in which this could have been worse; my mom is just one lucky son of a gun. However, the cop had been by to drop off her car keys and had also told her she'd not be able to drive anymore.

The Department of Motor Vehicles would suspend her license, because she'd had a medical episode while driving. While waiting for me to show up, she'd been thinking about options and what she'd need to change.



She'd need to quit her job, she said. Taking the bus wasn't an option she was willing to do and I'm too far away to drive her to and from work. That's not the loss it might seem, though, since her employer had cut hours a lot this year. My mom went from full- to part-time a few months ago, and over the last couple weeks had been getting as low as eleven hours per week.

We discussed keeping or selling the car, how to deal with groceries,and what to do about doctor's appointments. It was surprisingly easy, and I was grateful for that. One relative who lost driving privileges wasn't so compliant and we had to take his car away. I didn't want to do that to my mom.

Nurses came in and took blood sugar readings twice, and checked other things a couple of different times. The ER doctor came in twice, too. All of the staff were pleasant, friendly, and helpful. I wondered at the difference in how I felt as an observer in the "inner sanctum" as opposed to the waiting room. The atmosphere was very different, and
now I was grateful that this was the place they'd brought my mom. Weird, isn't it?

A little after 4pm the ER doctor released my mom. He said the driver's license might come back in six to twelve months, if her doctor could prove the blood sugar levels were stabilized. Of course, by then, my mom might not want to drive. She never really liked doing it anyway.

As we were walking out, a large family group was gathering and coming in, for what looked like very, very bad news. I was reminded again how lucky we were.

We went from the hospital to my mom's job to let her quit. She was scheduled the next morning at 8am and wouldn't make that shift, and without transportation couldn't keep the job. No sense in waiting. It wasn't easy watching my mom quit her job. She liked the work, and some of the people, and she would miss it. The manager would obviously miss
her, too.

After that we went through Kentucky Fried Chicken to pick up dinner. Who wants to cook after this kind of day?

Now we had a dilemma. Her car was downtown, in the not-so-good area. It's relatively new, just a couple of years old, and I didn't want to see it stripped or stolen. But we couldn't find anyone to help drive. So I had my mom hold off on her dinnertime insulin, and she would drive the car home (she hadn't lost the license yet!). I'd lead and we'd be careful.

Now, mind, we've been through this sugar drop before. Once the levels are back up and there's been no other drop for several hours, she's good to go. She was fine, and we had no worries about her ability.

We'd just had lots of carbs at dinner, and she hadn't taken any insulin. Worst case, if she had a problem, she'd run into *my* car, since I was leading.

We had a really hard time finding the car. I don't know that area very well, and my map in the Honda wouldn't recognize the address as existing. It said the numbers were too high. So we checked out one end of the street, followed it to the other end of the street as best we could - it's one of those streets that stops and starts, made more complicated by all the one-way streets downtown - and no luck. I'd just about given up when we topped a hill of some kind (drainage ditch overpass, maybe?) and my mom saw the sign of the establishment where the car was parked. Woot!

So we went that way and it was on the other side of the freeway. How in the world did her car end up on the opposite side of the freeway (and *blocks* north) of her doctor's office? Wow.

We found it, though, parked out there all by its lonesome. I made sure my mom was still feeling okay and we took off for home. It was dark, it felt late, but it was really still the tail end of rush hour, about 6pm. We had to get on the freeway for at least a short distance because neither of us knows any way around the river.

So I led us onto the freeway and my mom did fine. On the freeway, she dropped back too far and I couldn't keep cars from coming between us. Over the river, and I can get off the freeway. I saw a road I know pretty well, and took that exit. My mom came with me. However, the turn I need is too close to the freeway exit, and the traffic is too heavy to cross to the left turn lane. So I turned into the restaurant on the right after the intersection.

My mom cruised straight on by.

Frantically, I flipped the Honda around and sailed back out of the restaurant lot, in pursuit of my mom. I couldn't tell which car was hers. She, no doubt, couldn't tell which one was mine. I'm peering into every car I pass like a pervert (I wonder how many calls the cops
got?) and can't find her. Then as I pass a car in a left turn lane, I thought it was her. But I couldn't turn from this lane, so I go on until I can. By the time I get back to that intersection, the car I thought was hers is long gone. Did she turn left or turn around? I don't know.

But... if she turned around, she knows where she is and how to get home. If she turned left, she might not. So I follow where the carwould have gone if she turned left.

And I saw no cars that might be hers, even though I'm still looking into cars right and left.

It was dark, it felt late, and I've lost my mom. I have a cell phone, but she doesn't. There's nothing else I can do but go home and hope she finds her way. I'm thinking about what my options might be if she's not there, but I'm coming up blank. I'm calling myself names and wondering why I didn't just let the car get stolen.

I'm turning the corner and seeing her garage door open, the light on, and her car in it. She made it home! She was fine, of course. And knew her way back from the turn around she'd done. She thought she must have lost me because why would I have taken her that way?

So I guess we sort of lost each other. But the car is home, my mom is - relatively - fine, and while life will have some minor rearrangements, it's still good.

Does anyone have any tips about living without a car?

The Desk Drawer writer's exercise
list


Michelle
==================

A Brain Infection? A Medical Journey Surpassed by Few

A Medical Odyssey to a Quadruple Heart Bypass

To My Townhall Blog

My Twitter Page, I post all Blog posts there with the link

My Face Book Page

MySpace Page

EMAIL ME


==============

"How to Train Your Dragon"-Review; "Irish Eyes" Restaurant-Review; A Most Well-Behaved Child



Seriously. An Irish restaurant. We've got three of them down around our parts in Southern Delaware.

Here's a review of "Irish Eyes", a culinary adventure into cholesterol and prepared food that would have New York Mayor Nanny Bloomberg shutting the place down and arresting the cooks for attempted murder.
=====
The good news is: Kaitlyn is very well-behaved child.

The bad news is: Kaitlyn is a very well-behaved child.

She spent a long weekend with Mom-Mom in 2010, this year of our Lord. We searched for Easter Eggs, met Mr. Easter bunny, and Mrs, dyed Easter eggs, and saw a great movie.

Yet what is it about this very remarkably well-behaved child that so bothers her Mom-Mom?
=====
We're gonna have Vikings and Dragons from now through next Christmas as the merchandisers rush to cash in on Pixar's latest offering: "How to Train Your Dragon".

It's a great movie, if formulaic. Kids from four to fourteen will love it, as will their adult companions for its action, 3-D effects and colorful characters.

A review and a few complaints.


Pic of the Day



Movie review header



”How To Train Your Dragon”-3D and Endless Merchandising

It’s not that I have any problem with merchandising a movie. I’ve long ago become accustomed to such as little toys associated with a movie being included as part of McDonald’s Happy Meals. In fact, I offer it as a point of excitement as I always take granddaughter to a nearby play McDonalds after we go to the movies and before I place the order I drum up Kaitlyn’s excitement by the promise of a toy in her meal that applies to the movie we’d just seen.

Indeed it was the same this past weekend when we’d both seen the movie “How To Train Your Dragon” and indeed included in Kaitlyn’s Happy Meal was a little figurine of lead character Hiccup’s obligatory love interest, Astrid, riding one of the movie’s many…well dragons.

It’s just that this movie is merchandised bejeesus to the point of complete distraction. Vikings and dragons can be purchased in abundance at Walmart or other retailers near you. There’s the McDonalds connection, ever present. We’ve got Vikings and dragons everywhere and Lord knows when it will all fade away. When Pixar has another movie to merchandise or when dragon rides are finally installed in Disney World no doubt.

Movie Web Site here



“How To Train Your Dragon” is the stuff of movie formulas for kids ranging from age 5 thru early teens. First you must have a lovable but pathetic sort of main character that early on must prove something to himself if not the entire world. Second this character must have some sort of love interest, but keep it clean, just a crush sort of thing, perhaps a chaste kiss at the end. Third, there must be some adventure that kids will like with their budding imaginations and what better to meet this criteria than dragons? Every little kid imagines dragons all about, under the bed, perhaps right outside the window.

If I sound jaded please indulge. This was a very enjoyable movie, it had a splendid, if somewhat convoluted story, you had the Vikings all involved and these fellows made great 3D images alongside the fire-breathing dragons.

It’s just that with granddaughter I’ve been to many of these sorts of movies and so far the winner is “UP” but that’s just me.

I’d give this movie an A- if not a solid A for the storyline, adventure, graphics and the 3D is always a great way to watch a movie. Granddaughter adores 3D movies.

But let’s not kid ourselves that this movie is cinema of a mighty intellectual caliber. Still, movie genres, even the formulaic, can be done badly but “How To Train Your Dragon” was done wonderfully.

A few nitpicks: The main dragon character, intriguingly named “Toothless”, really didn’t look all that scary. In fact, he looked like a pet dog. This sort of dragon was characterized in the movie as the most vicious kind of all but those big puppy-dragon eyes and humorous name was a bit incongruous with this depiction.

In addition, the plot line about the dragons’ lair and why they had to raid the Vikings’ livestock was very unclear to me. There was a big bogeyman dragon but the relationship of that dragon to the other dragons was a bit fuzzy. Was it the Queen of all dragons or was it the slaveholder of all the dragons?

Not that 6-year-old granddaughter questioned any of this and she fell in love with Toothless, something I suspect the animators intended.

Thus to those readers with kids do not fear that the vague storylines will distract from the young human’s enjoyment of the film one bit.
=================
 Posted by Hello


Easter 2010 Visit to Mom-Mom’s…- A Most Well Behaved Child

There’s good news and there’s bad news concerning granddaughter’s most recent visit during her school spring vacation break of 2010.

The good news is that she is a remarkably well-behaved child.

The bad news is that she is a remarkably well-behaved child.



Husband has a nephew a couple of years older than Kaitlyn. He’s a handsome young man but as legend would have it, he’s a bit of a handful.

First, he’s a little boy and no matter what the Fema-Nazis might tell you, there’s major differences in the behaviors of little boys versus little girls. But even allowing for this, it seems to me that husband’s nephew is nowhere near as well-behaved as Kaitlyn.

Husband tends to look upon his nephew’s childish exploits with a wink and a nod, smiling a big one as he iterates yet another bit of mischief on behalf of errant nephew. I must smile too because frankly I’ve yet to hear of any of the boy’s actions that are beyond the pale of normal but he does get into trouble in such a fashion that would have the perfectly behaved Kaitlyn sobbing in shame deep into the night.

I love Kaitlyn, but of course. And of course I am proud of how well-behaved she is. Yet I worry. I think Kaitlyn could use perhaps a soupcon of husband’s rascally nephew’s mischieviousness. This country was not founded on the meek of soul is what I’m saying here and there’ve been times when I wanted to slap Kaitlyn alongside the head that she defend herself what say you? At her recent birthday party, there was another kid all opening KAITLYN’S gifts and I had to stop the kid from doing this while Kaitlyn just sat by and let the little monster open her gifts.

Kaitlyn makes a full blown career out of getting “perfect kid of the day/week/month/year” awards. She never gets the purple tag, purple being the color of the bad kids. I’m thinking husband’s nephew has one or two of these. She has bookmarks for God’s sake that fall out of her books that are prizes for being most well-behaved, sweetest, lovliest, insert nice adjective here child of the hour.

Again, I love the child. I can take her anywhere and never have to worry about ill-behavior. Folks all around her remark on how well-behaved she is, and she is.

Yet I recall the incident of the little boy at bible school. Seems the children attending the summer bible school were to perform a skit of some sort for the parents. As part of the skit, the children were to exit, or enter I’m not sure, the stage, with a pre-assigned partner, of the opposite sex I think but again am not sure. The young tot assigned to walk with Kaitlyn stopped right during the live presentation and for some reason refused to walk with Kaitlyn as scripted and practiced. Kaitlyn broke down in tears at the slight and humiliation. The bible school teachers rushed to the stage and tried to comfort Kaitlyn while dealing with the oddball little brat boy who refused to walk with my granddaughter. At some point Kaitlyn was comforted enough to walk the stage without that kid with no taste.

When I found about this incident I told Kaitlyn, with my tongue in cheek, that she should have called me up and I’d have gone right down there and punched that kid right in the nose.

“Un-nuh,” Kaitlyn said to that suggestion. For it would be bad behavior to punch the little kid in the nose though Mom-Mom would wipe the floor with him in a New York second.

Now I’m not saying that husband’s rascally nephew would punch another child in the nose who would suddenly refuse to walk the stage with him as planned, practiced and assigned. But I’m thinking he wouldn’t stand up on the stage and break down in tears either. I’m thinking young nephew would probably spend one, maybe two seconds trying to cajole a reluctant child who would not walk with him. Then, as I envision it, young nephew would take on a big smile and walk across the damn stage all by himself, indeed, and likely with a spring in his step and an air of importance that he should be so special as to not need another child alongside to share the spotlight.

Heh.

At any rate, lest God strike me dead for sounding in any way that I regret having such a well-behaved granddaughter, let me shut up right now.

I marveled constantly at Kaitlyn’s wonderful behavior. During those times when Mom-Mom told her to go entertain herself she dutifully sat at her little table and chair and worked diligently on creating wonderful drawings with cheap paper and crayons. When I plopped her in the bathtub she played for so long I had to go in and pull her out complete with her fingers shriveled up and wrinkled as if she were 90. When we were at the church and as the choir practiced before mass begins, and well before she would be called to the Little Apostle Sunday School, she took an offered piece of music as we tuned up and yes she did, the child stood and sang along with the rest of us and further, after we were done our practice round Kaitlyn continued, “reading” the music and not doing half bad. She raised her voice when the notes went high and lowered it as the notes went down and soon the entire choir was giggling at this next American Idol wannabe.

In the movie she only once, and toward the end and with reluctance, asked to go pee and I appealed to her to stay for just the remaining fifteen minutes left to go in the movie. I know she had to go as I did too and I knew that she really didn’t want to have to leave just then but she had to be uncomfortable. At any rate she managed to sit still until the movie was over then we both ran to the rest room.

She sits quietly in the car, always hooking up her seatbelt before the car should move. She exits the car safely and promptly places both hands on the doors of the vehicle, a rule insisted upon by yon Mom-Mom who wishes to avoid the child suddenly bolting into the driving area from between parked cars, an action difficult to do if both hands are placed steadfast on the parked car’s door. She watches her DVD at night while Mom-Mom watches the big TV and she goes to sleep as she is told.

She doesn’t whine and complain when she is told an activity is finished. She fetches her shoes at the play McDonalds as I instruct. She puts her toys away as told.

Seriously. The kid is great. She tends to get a little melo-dramatic at times but she’s smart enough to know when she goes from believable to the stuff of the Lifetime Movie Network.

I think she needs just a bit more spunk is what I’m suggesting here. Maybe I’ll arrange for Kaitlyn to spend some time with that mischievious nephew.

Below a movie compilation of Kaitlyn’s visit.







”Irish Eyes”-A Restaurant Featuring Comfort Meals That Might Kill You

Let me sum it up by stating that if southern Delaware’s infamous “Irish Eyes” restaurant was in New York Mayor Bloomberg would shut it down toot de sweet and have the owners thrown in jail for attempted murder.

New York, along with Nanny Bloomberg, is on a mission to make all New Yorkers healthy, already prohibiting foods fried in trans-fat and on a mission to cut salt usage drastically.

On a recent visit to Irish Eyes restaurant located in Lewes, Delaware I ordered a concoction that would have Bloomberg beating up the cook bejeesus with a billy club.

Irish Eyes, Lewes Delaware restaurant, web site.

Which is not to say that I didn’t quite enjoy the meal but go with me here, as one with a heart-bypass and a penchant for racking up high cholesterol, I could only indulge in this sort of dinner maybe once, twice a year, tops.

I began the meal with a fine appetizer, heart-approved, of something called “almost famous” cucumber bruschetta.

The treat consisted of about six pieces of Melba type toast drizzled with balsamic vinegar. The “bruschetta” contained tiny, perfect squares of feta cheese and fresh cucumber.

Bruschetta is a dish one normally associates with tomatoes, perhaps onions, some celery, chopped up finely. It is a sort of watery salsa usually scooped up with a piece of dried toast type bread or large crackers. The only problem I had with this Irish Eyes “almost famous” bruschetta is those perfectly square pieces of feta cheese. Good feta cheese is crumbly. You get those exactly square pieces of the stuff and you’ve got a very processed sort of feta cheese, not the very earthly tasting cheese made from goat’s milk. Like American cheese can be processed and formed into perfect blocks and manipulated to become the stuff of velveeta, so can feta cheese. Indeed, this feta cheese was certainly edible but it was lacking. If Irish Eyes would use real feta cheese maybe this bruschetta dish would finally become famous. The fresh cucumbers, however, and the Melba toast with the balsamic vinegar were perfect. This appetizer had the zesty feel of a summer garden.



For my entrĂ©e I chose a dish called “Seafood Shepherd’s Pie”.

I’d debated long before the anticipated visit whether to get that very Irish meal of corned beef and cabbage. Since I am very Irish in ancestry, I love corned beef and some kind of pork, cooked in a big pot along with plenty of potatoes, of course. But I balked. First, I like my cabbage boiled to nothing-hood, not that I’m proud of this. Restaurants of this day tend to barely boil vegetables, serving them in the trendy “crisp-tender” final product. I say phooey on that. If I want a salad, I’ll ask for a salad, darn it.

Thus I did not want to order what I’d hope would be a big plate of mushy cabbage with potatoe pieces to the side and a couple of healthy slices of corned beef and instead get a wedge of “crisp tender” cabbage and some chewy potatoes.

But Shepherd’s Pie? How could you go wrong with this?

Shepherd’s pie is another English/Irish dish, consisting of at a minimum a combination of mashed potatoes over some sort of protein in gravy. Beyond that shepherd’s pie is a cook’s creation and could include the addition of various vegetables with meat ranging from stew beef to ground beef.

The Irish Eyes concoction added a layer of melted cheese over the mashed potatoes and hey, that sounded fine to me.

The dish also included shrimp, big hunks of scallops and some lobster meat in a creamy gravy that contained fresh tomatoes, zuchinni, carrots and celery. I dislike zuchinni and yes it came “crisp-tender” so I pulled all this out. The cheese layer over the mashed potatoes, folks it was a bit over the top and I could not have finished that big plate of melted goo on a dare. But it was very good, yes it was. Took me two days to eat it at home and this was for the best in that my cholesterol rose just looking at this dish.

Husband had fish and chips. The fish looked to be fried just perfect though I didn’t take a bite. I already had more than I could handle with that shepherd’s pie.

I ordered an appetizer of wings in sesame-honey sauce to go plus I had a Margarita. Our bills for the meal, the two appetizers, one drink and two entrees was $60.00 which included a nice tip. Service was excellent by the way. Those wings were delicious after a quick heat in the microwave the following day.

Yes I’d go to Irish Eyes again but I’d have to limit such eating adventures to once a year. I’m not sure about husband as this sort of fare is definitely not the sort of stuff he enjoys. We only went this one time because…well it’s a long story.


To the Main Blog…Over a Million Page Views

EMAIL ME





A Brain Infection? A Medical Journey Surpassed by Few

A Medical Odyssey to a Quadruple Heart Bypass

To My Townhall Blog

My Twitter Page, I post all Blog posts there with the link

My Face Book Page

MySpace Page

EMAIL ME


==============